Access

Credit-based access. No success fees, no conflicts.

LPGP.network is paid for by the lightness of an interaction, not the outcome of it. Participants pay credits to engage the coordination layer — and nothing else. The model keeps us structurally neutral toward every dialogue we carry.

Access plans

Start with a free allowance. Reload only when you need to.

Every organisation that joins the network receives a starting balance of credits. From there, access scales with usage — not with seat counts.

Onboarding

Starter

Free

A starting balance of credits is provisioned for every new organisation on signup, intended for the first cycle of exploratory dialogue.

  • Free starting credits per organisation
  • Unlimited users within the organisation
  • Access to all coordination features
  • Standard support
Request access
Institutional

Programmatic

By arrangement

For larger institutional participants running sustained, multi-team coordination workflows on the platform.

  • Annual credit envelopes
  • Multi-team workspaces with internal isolation
  • Dedicated point of contact
  • Tailored audit and retention controls
Arrange a conversation
Credit schedule

Pay for the bandwidth of the interaction.

Lighter, anonymous exchanges cost a small amount of credit. Heavier, high-bandwidth interactions — for example, a live introduction — cost meaningfully more, reflecting the coordination work behind them.

Interaction Identity exposure Relative cost
Anonymous enquiry
Open a structured, identity-shielded enquiry to relevant counterparties.
None Low
Sustained anonymous dialogue
Ongoing identity-isolated thread mediated by the intelligence layer.
None Medium
Term coordination
AI-assisted articulation and alignment of mutual terms prior to introduction.
None Medium
Live introduction
Identities are revealed to consenting parties and a live conversation is scheduled.
By consent High

Credits are consumed by the party originating the interaction, but participants may agree — through the platform — to apportion the cost differently depending on the specifics of a given dialogue.

Why this model

Neutrality, by construction.

01

No success-based incentives

We are paid for the coordination work itself, not for the outcomes it leads to. This is what allows the platform to be genuinely impartial across every participant in a dialogue.

02

No seat licences

Adding more colleagues from the same organisation never adds cost. Whole teams can participate from a single credit balance, and access scales with usage instead of headcount.

03

Network growth incentives

A modest, cash-based programme rewards participants who introduce other relevant parties to the network — provided those parties are themselves the kind of participant the network is built for.